Forum

× Lab CT Version, news, test results, new features request and suggestions

Question CT LAB ver 6.10

  • Sternas Stefanos
  • Sternas Stefanos's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Ex Pilot, M.Sc, Ph.D
More
1 year 3 months ago - 1 year 3 months ago #10604 by Sternas Stefanos
Replied by Sternas Stefanos on topic CT LAB ver 6.10
We release LAB CodeTyphon 6.10 Revision 006030 BETA1
Please test and report...

CodeTyphon Architect and Programmer
Last edit: 1 year 3 months ago by Sternas Stefanos.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 3 months ago - 1 year 3 months ago #10605 by usbdoo
Replied by usbdoo on topic CT LAB ver 6.10
Debian GNU/Linux 8.5 (jessie)
Cross Compiling on Rasppery pi 2 not work
Program compile ok.
But when start program I get

HandleExeption error reading fmtest.Left: Unknown propert y: "Left"
Last edit: 1 year 3 months ago by usbdoo.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Klaus Riesterer
  • Offline
  • Junior Boarder
  • Junior Boarder
More
1 year 3 months ago #10608 by Klaus Riesterer
Replied by Klaus Riesterer on topic CT LAB ver 6.10
I think it's a really bad idea to rename the project file extensions.
It makes it more difficult to take part on the fpc community and complicates teamwork.

Please add tiOPF-framework, it's really great and platform independent !
github.com/graemeg/tiopf/tree/tiopf2
github.com/graemeg/tiopf_apps

Regards Klaus
The following user(s) said Thank You: Avra

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 3 months ago #10609 by Dinko
Replied by Dinko on topic CT LAB ver 6.10
> I think it's a really bad idea to rename the project file extensions.
> It makes it more difficult to take part on the fpc community and complicates teamwork.

I would say that I agree with statements above

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 3 months ago #10610 by Michal
Replied by Michal on topic CT LAB ver 6.10
Already rename package was bad, and the current change of names of the projects even worse.

Michal

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Klaus Riesterer
  • Offline
  • Junior Boarder
  • Junior Boarder
More
1 year 3 months ago #10611 by Klaus Riesterer
Replied by Klaus Riesterer on topic CT LAB ver 6.10
Principle the package renames makes sense and should also be done in lazarus!

But I think PilotLogic takes not really part at the community. They take what they can but less is coming back.
Please don't misunderstand - I really like CT and in the moment I work with, but it should - in (file and package) base - always be compatible with Lazarus.
It has less sense to change classnames and filenames in CT - the projects can never more opened with Lazarus.
Such things should be independent from both - Lazarus and CT!

I think it's time now to change to the original: Lazarus

Regards Klaus

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Sternas Stefanos
  • Sternas Stefanos's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Ex Pilot, M.Sc, Ph.D
More
1 year 3 months ago #10614 by Sternas Stefanos
Replied by Sternas Stefanos on topic CT LAB ver 6.10
Guys, thanks for your posts

We have big plans, old Lazarus file formats can't support our vision...
We must go on

CodeTyphon Architect and Programmer

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 3 months ago #10615 by Dinko
Replied by Dinko on topic CT LAB ver 6.10
In that case, go on. You know what you need.
Main reason, for me, to keep compatibility with Lazarus, is ability to switch back to stable FPC and stable Lazarus in case something happen to PilotLogic.
Therefore, I try to program simple and not use all features of language and libraries, because I do not know PilotLogic plans for the future and Lazarus plans for the future.
So far (and I use PilotLogic for 3 years in production), I was always able to find fix or workaround for some problems (thanks to the PilotLogic people, and, also FPC/lazarus forums).
BTW, it will be great that you somehow enable us to choose between trunk FPC and stable FPC during installation.

For me it is crucial to maintain stability of product (I think 6.00 is most stable so far), because I have services and applications that runs 24/7 and 365 days per year.

Generally speaking I think FPC/Delphi is loosing surviving war, because young people rather use some other tools and programming languages. It is a shame, because FPC is fast, works on lot of platforms ... (old programmers knows pro and cons).

Personally I like to use FPC on server side (which is not very usual case), and I think we need only few things to put into standard FPC that will make Pascal shine again. This is something like interpropcess communication libraries (0mq or nanomsg). We also need support for distributed systems, translation of Kafka C libraries, support for some key value databases (Mongo) and so on.
Because Pascal is great language and enforce programmer to write quality code (declare variables), and solve many problems at compile time (unlike nodejs, php and some other script languages), I think it is great for server side programming (especially, lets say, stable server side programming)

Anyhow, CodeTyphon is great tools and it is good to have something like this in Pascal world.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 3 months ago - 1 year 3 months ago #10616 by Johnathan Dhoe
Replied by Johnathan Dhoe on topic CT LAB ver 6.10

Sternas Stefanos wrote: Guys, thanks for your posts

We have big plans, old Lazarus file formats can't support our vision...
We must go on


What are you talking about? The new files are EXACTLY the same as the old ones, just with different extensions.
Last edit: 1 year 3 months ago by Johnathan Dhoe.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Sternas Stefanos
  • Sternas Stefanos's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Ex Pilot, M.Sc, Ph.D
More
1 year 3 months ago #10617 by Sternas Stefanos
Replied by Sternas Stefanos on topic CT LAB ver 6.10
We will add code from CT ver 6.40 Sir
Next CT ver 6.10 it's only a step

CodeTyphon Architect and Programmer

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.